Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,646 of 17,520    |
|    JTS to All    |
|    Thermodynamics of photoluminescence    |
|    12 Sep 19 01:15:06    |
      From: pireddag@hotmail.com              I posted this a few days ago in it.scienza.fisica (in Italian), but I       did not get any answer there. I try here.              I raed a few days ago “The chemical potential of radiation,”, di P.       Wurfel, J. Phys. C Solid State Phys., vol. 15, 3967 (1982).              It explains (I forgot many details but the synthesis here should be       enough) how to calculate radiation from a semiconductor in which some       electrons have been excited from te valence to the conduction band.              The steps are the following.              Excited electrons and the one in the valence band reach quickly and       separately an equilibrium distribution, while the two separate       populations are not in equilibrium with each other (so both       distributions are in quasi-equilibrium).              The two distributions (conduction band and valence band electrons) are       characterized by two different chemical potentials              The interaction with the electromagnetic field is given by absorption,       stimulated emission and spontaneous emission.              One then imposes that the sums of transitions per unit time and per unit       energy caused by stimulated emission, absorption and spontaneous       emission leaves the system in equilibrium:              r_sp + r_st + r_a = 0              I do not understand this. Why should radiation maintain the       quasi-equilibrium of the system? Is it approximately true? If so, why       and what is the approximation? Should I perhaps see the semiconductor as       under continuous excitation by a source which I am not counting in the       above equation?              The experimental data shown in the article (luminescence from a GaAs       diode) match well the calculation done in the article (perhaps there is       a fitting parameter, did not read again before posting).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca