Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,664 of 17,516    |
|    Majik Won to All    |
|    Re: The Feynman Path Integra from First     |
|    10 Dec 19 22:08:22    |
      From: friend@logictophysics.com              Physics is described by particles moving along a path and what       influences the shape of that path. But a path can be formulated as       a series of steps through space and time. Each step follows from       another; the previous step is necessary before the next step can       occur. If you are at this point, then the next point will be here;       then if you are at that point, then the next point will be there,       etc. So each step can be viewed as an implication of logic, where       the next step necessarily follows from the previous step. So a path       is conjunction of implications. And if we map conjunction with       multiplication and implication with the Dirac delta function in the       continuum limit, then a path gets mapped to a multiplication of       exponential Gaussian functions. The exponents in all the Gaussian       functions for all of the steps gets added together. And what results       seems to be an action integral of a Lagrangian. Now we know where       the Lagrangian comes from.              What I've shown is that a material implication of logic can be       equated to an infinite disjunction of an infinite conjunction of       implications. And when mapped to the math, this becomes an infinite       number of integrations of an exponential of an action integral;       this is equal to the Feynman Path Integral.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca