Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,763 of 17,516    |
|    Jos Bergervoet to All    |
|    Navier-Stokes questions..    |
|    08 Nov 20 16:18:02    |
      From: bergervo@xs4all.nl              The Navier-Stokes equations can be simplified in two ways:       by putting to zero the compressibility and/or the viscosity,       which then leaves us with 4 cases..              Does the "millennium problem" of proving or disproving the       smoothness of the solution require the full case, or would       solving it for a simplified case already be enough? (I'm       asking because we don't want to do the work and then still       not get one million dollar, of course!)              I would expect that the doubly simplified case is too       trivial.. but is the solution in that case actually known       already? That would be the question:        "Are there solutions for a non-compressible, non-viscous        fluid that start with smooth initial conditions and then        develop a singularity?"              Since non-viscosity means the equations are time reversal       invariant, the question could also be: can you start with       a singular solution and have the time-evolution smooth it       out? (To me the answer seems likely to be yes, but as said,       I don't know whether it has been proven. It might be both       simple and difficult, like the Goldbach conjecture..)              --       Jos              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca