Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,802 of 17,516    |
|    Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All    |
|    How well do we know the value of G?    |
|    10 Mar 21 10:09:17    |
      XPost: sci.astro.research       From: helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de              How well do we know the value of G?              G is the constant (well, as far as we know) of nature whose value is       known with the least precision. How well do we know it? Presumably       only Cavendish-type experiments can measure it directly. Other       measurements of G, particularly astronomical ones, probably actually       measure GM, or GMm. In some cases, those quantities might be known to       more precision than G itself.              Suppose G were to vary with time, or place, or (thinking of something       like MOND here) with the acceleration in question. Could that be       detected, or would it be masked by wrong assumptions about the mass(es)       involved?              Just as an example, would a smaller value of G and correspondingly       higher masses be compatible with LIGO observations?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca