Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,805 of 17,516    |
|    jacobnavia to All    |
|    Re: How well do we know the value of G?    |
|    06 Apr 21 18:48:11    |
      XPost: sci.astro.research       From: jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr              Le 10/03/2021 11:09, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) a écrit :              > How well do we know the value of G?       >       > G is the constant (well, as far as we know) of nature whose value is       > known with the least precision. How well do we know it? Presumably       > only Cavendish-type experiments can measure it directly. Other       > measurements of G, particularly astronomical ones, probably actually       > measure GM, or GMm. In some cases, those quantities might be known to       > more precision than G itself.       >       > Suppose G were to vary with time, or place, or (thinking of something       > like MOND here) with the acceleration in question. Could that be       > detected, or would it be masked by wrong assumptions about the mass(es)       > involved?       >       > Just as an example, would a smaller value of G and correspondingly       > higher masses be compatible with LIGO observations?              There is a very interesting article in scientific american about this:              see              https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-measure-th       -gravitational-force-between-the-smallest-masses-yet/              [Moderator's note: See also https://www.aspelmeyer.quantum.at/news/ -P.H.]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca