Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,839 of 17,520    |
|    Tom Roberts to J. J. Lodder    |
|    Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum    |
|    05 Jul 21 11:36:42    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 6/29/21 1:41 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:       > [...] The speed of light cannot 'really' be variable. [...]              You make far too many assumptions to be reasonable.              Certainly the (vacuum) speed of light COULD vary, it's just that in the       world we inhabit, with current technology, it is observed to not vary       significantly (when measured using standard clocks and rulers at rest in       some locally inertial frame). But it certainly is possible that in the       future we will develop technology with greatly improved resolution and       discover that it actually does vary in the world we inhabit. It is also       possible we will never find it varies -- science is a JOURNEY, not a       destination.              Yes, c is really a units conversion factor, IN THE SPACETIME MODEL. And       yes, it is not possible for the symmetry speed of Lorentzian manifolds       to vary. But the restriction you imagine is on that symmetry speed, and       not really on the (vacuum) speed of light -- there is no fundamental       reason why light must propagate at the symmetry speed.              Note that it is an historical accident that we call the symmetry speed       of Lorentzian manifolds by the name "the speed of light" (with "vacuum"       implied). Light really has nothing to do with it.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca