Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,870 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Eric Flesch    |
|    Re: Breaking the light speed barrier (Ar    |
|    16 Aug 21 12:14:44    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 8/9/21 12:57 PM, Eric Flesch wrote:       > The problem with sub-c neutrinos is that they would all need to be       > accelerated to near-c speed by their emitters.              That's no different from any other decay or emission, in which the       daughter particles emerge at high speed, often approaching or equal to       c. But they are not "accelerated" to such speeds, they are created with       such speeds -- a common aspect of elementary particle interactions.              > Why so uniform? You'd expect to find some at slower speeds.              The upper bound on the mass of the electron neutrino is 1.1 eV. The       lowest-energy neutrinos detected are far above that energy, so one would       NOT expect to detect such neutrinos with speeds measurably slower than       c. Ditto for muon neutrinos, for which the upper bound on mass is 0.19 MeV.              As the moderator says, lower-energy neutrinos have smaller interaction       cross-sections, and even high-energy neutrinos have very tiny ones. So       it is very difficult to detect them. On earth there are billions of       low-energy neutrinos per cubic meter, but we don't notice them at all,       except for the largest and most sensitive neutrino detectors (which       are unable to measure their speed).              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca