Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,927 of 17,516    |
|    Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot    |
|    Re: Gravity and free fall    |
|    10 Mar 22 09:01:07    |
      From: mlfasf@comcast.net              On 3/7/22 2:09 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote:              > But with a UNIFORM and constant gravitational field (absolutely parallel       > field lines, and no variation in field strength), the equivalence       > principle says this is equivalent to two test bodies undergoing the same       > constant acceleration, with no gravitational field present.       >       > [[Mod. note --       > Note also that in the context of general relativity, one needs to be       > careful in invoking the equivalence principle for a *uniform* *constant*       > gravitational field. The problem is that such a field is the result of       > (i.e., implies the presence of) an infinite mass plane,              True,              >which means that       > spacetime is *not* asymptotically flat. That has a number of "interesting"       > consequences...       > -- jt]]       >              Can you elaborate on that? Why does that imply that spacetime "is not       asymptotically flat"? And what exactly does "asymptotically flat" mean?               Mike Fontenot              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca