Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,955 of 17,516    |
|    Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: The braking of the traveler twin    |
|    02 Apr 22 10:51:23    |
      From: mlfasf@comcast.net              On 4/2/22 12:22 AM, Tom Roberts wrote:       > On 3/20/22 5:44 AM, Mike Fontenot wrote:       >>       >> Doesn't that convey a sense of "meaningfulness", to the observers who       >> are stationary in that frame? I think Einstein thought it does.       >       > You simply implemented the CONVENTION of Einstein synchronization. If       > you synchronized the clocks differently you would get a different       > result.       >              If you synchronized those clocks differently, you would be ignoring the       fundamental assumption that special relativity is based on: that the       speed of light in any inertial frame is always equal to the universal       constant "c".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca