Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,957 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot    |
|    Re: The braking of the traveler twin    |
|    03 Apr 22 22:15:18    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 4/2/22 12:51 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote:       > On 4/2/22 12:22 AM, Tom Roberts wrote:       >> You simply implemented the CONVENTION of Einstein synchronization.       >> If you synchronized the clocks differently you would get a       >> different result.       >       > If you synchronized those clocks differently, you would be ignoring       > the fundamental assumption that special relativity is based on: that       > the speed of light in any inertial frame is always equal to the       > universal constant "c".              As you say, that assumption of SR applies in any INERTIAL FRAME. But if       one synchronized those clocks differently, they would not yield the time       coordinate of an inertial frame, so the assumptions of SR simply would       not apply, and can be ignored.               [Don't ask me why anyone would do that, I'm merely pointing        out that it is possible. The usual Einstein synchronization        is used because it simplifies the math. As I said before:        Don't confuse an ordinary human desire for simplicity        (laziness) with anything more profound.]              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca