Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,960 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot    |
|    Re: The braking of the traveler twin    |
|    05 Apr 22 20:53:33    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 4/3/22 12:13 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote:       > On 4/2/22 11:36 AM, (I) Mike Fontenot wrote:       >> So there you have it. That's the calculation that defines "NOW"       >> for the AO and all of the HF's, and makes simultaneity at a       >> distance a meaningful concept for them. Simultaneity at a       >> distance is not a choice.              Yes, simultaneity at a distance is a choice. Your approach is       outrageously unphysical -- maneuvering the ship causes unphysical       changes in the "age" ascribed to a distant friend.              > But what does the above say about the current age of the home twin       > (she), according to the traveling twin (he), for each instant in his       > life on his trip? The answer is that the above equations give the       > same results as the Co-Moving-Inertial-Frames (CMIF) simultaneity       > method. That is very fortuitous, because the CMIF method is       > relatively easy to use. The value of the array of clocks discussed       > above (which establish a "NOW" moment for the accelerating observer       > that extends throughout all space) is that they GUARANTEE that the       > CMIF results are fully meaningful to the traveler, and that the CMIF       > method is the ONLY correct simultaneity method for him.              As I keep pointing out and you keep ignoring, this is outrageously       unphysical. If the traveling twin maneuvers his spaceship, the "age" he       ascribes to a distant friend can change very rapidly. No sensible person       would believe that local actions he takes can "change" his friend's age.              > He has no other choice.              Not at all. The traveling twin can recognize that his current time is       completely divorced from that of his friend far away. If the age of his       friend is important to him, he would keep track of his motion relative       to the ICRF, knowing that regardless of his motion or location, the       current time of the ICRF can be used to calculate the current age of his       friend (for all practical purposes his friend on earth is at rest in       the ICRF). Any sensible astronaut would do that.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca