Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,973 of 17,516    |
|    Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts    |
|    Re: The braking of the traveler twin    |
|    12 Apr 22 07:21:19    |
      From: mlfasf@comcast.net              On 4/11/22 1:19 PM, Tom Roberts wrote:       >       > If you are an astronaut in a spaceship that can travel at an appreciable       > fraction of c, and which you maneuver, then such an array of clocks is       > impossible -- each such clock must vary its acceleration in concert with       > yours [...]              No, that's not correct. According to the accelerating observer (the       AO), whose conclusions we seek, he and each of his "helper friends"       (HF's) undergo EXACTLY the same (constant) acceleration, as recorded on       their accelerometers. This is clear by looking at the equivalent       scenario in the case of a constant gravitational field with no       accelerations (via the equivalence principle) ... all of those people       are motionless, unaccelerated, and mutually stationary. And according       to them, the distance between each of them is also constant. In the       acceleration scenario (in the infinite flat spacetime of special       relativity), perpetually-inertial observers, who are initially       stationary with respect to the AO and the HF's, WILL conclude that the       accelerations of the AO and the various HF's, and their distances apart,       DO vary with time. But it is not their conclusions that I am interested in.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca