Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,990 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: Einstein's elevator    |
|    22 Apr 22 10:39:45    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 4/21/22 2:24 AM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > Richard Livingston marted=EC 19/04/2022 alle ore 15:28:38 ha       > scritto:       >> With respect to this inertial frame it is the earth that is       >> accelerating upward.       >       > This is incomprehensible.              Not really. But one must be thinking in terms of General Relativity       (GR), not Newtonian mechanics (NM).              > Acceleration occurs in the presence of a force (F=ma).              But there quite clearly is a force: for an object sitting at rest on the       surface of the earth, there is an upward force on it, which we call       "weight".              > This force justifies the downward acceleration of the elevator but       > could never justify the acceleration of the entire earth mass       > upward!              You need more precision in your thoughts and words. "Acceleration" by       itself is insufficiently defined -- use either "proper acceleration" or       specify a (locally) inertial frame relative to which it is measured.       "The entire earth mass" is likewise ill defined -- consider just a small       portion of its surface. A small object at rest on earth's surface has a       proper acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2 (directed upward); in GR this is in       response to the (upward) force exerted on the object by the earth's surface.               [In physics, "proper" means "relative to the instantaneously        co-moving inertial frame of the object in question".]              In NM, near the surface of the earth, we generally use coordinates in       which that surface is at rest. This hides the underlying issue -- these       coordinates hide the force that the surface exerts on such objects. NM       then adds a gravitational force to cancel the force the surface exerts,       yielding net zero force -- this is CLEARLY WRONG as we humans can feel       the force from the surface on our bodies, and it is clearly not zero. GR       corrects this conceptual error:              In GR, near the surface of the earth, locally inertial frames are all       accelerating downward at 9.8 m/s^2, so an object at rest on the surface       is accelerating (upward) relative to them -- responding to the force       that the surface exerts on such objects.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca