Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,051 of 17,516    |
|    Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: Newton's bucket    |
|    14 Jul 22 05:29:41    |
      From: julio@diegidio.name              On Wednesday, 13 July 2022 at 11:50:42 UTC+2, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > When Newton's bucket starts to rotate, the water slowly starts to       > rotate as well and accelerates outwards due to the centrifugal force.              What matters is not really how we get there, just the steady state is       of interest, by which I mean the water is at rest relative to the bucket.              > But the centrifugal force is ONLY in the rotating reference and not in       > the inertial one.              There is in fact a corresponding centripetal force in the inertial frame       in which the bucket is rotating, which amounts to a combination of the       pressure forces ultimately sustained by the walls of the bucket, and       of course the gravitational force: hence it's obliquus.              > So, how is the centrifugal acceleration of water justified EVEN in the       > inertial reference where the centrifugal force is not there?              That should be clear now. That said, the point with Newton's bucket       (as I get it) is that, in the reference frame *of the bucket*, where does       the apparent *centrifugal* force come from? Since, by relativity, the       situation should be totally equivalent to the universe rotating around       a bucket at rest...              Julio              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca