Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,079 of 17,516    |
|    Richard Livingston to All    |
|    Conservation of Information in QM    |
|    01 Sep 22 17:30:55    |
      From: richalivingston@gmail.com              Can anyone give a clear explanation why information has to be conserved       in quantum mechanics?              I was not taught this when first learning about QM in the 1970's. As       best as I can tell the idea comes from the idea that the QM wave       function evolves per a unitary operator that can, in principle, be       reversed to recover the past state as well as calculate the future state       of the system.              It seems to me that this argument is missing two important facts: -The       wave function is not real, it is only a mathematical tool for predicting       the probabilities of future states -The actual future is one of many       predicted by the wave function, and likewise can be the result of many       different possible past states.              It seems to me that each time the wave function "collapses" that       information is lost. Is there a good argument why this is wrong?              Rich L.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca