Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,094 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston    |
|    Re: Conservation of Information in QM    |
|    08 Sep 22 09:13:23    |
      From: tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 9/7/22 6:35 AM, Richard Livingston wrote:       > [...] Seriously, isn't collapse a part of reality, or required by       > reality?              No. There are interpretations of QM that do not involve any "collapse of       the wavefunction". See, for example:               Ballentine, _Quantum_Mechanics:_A_Modern_Development_.              The basic idea is that whenever one makes a measurement of a quantum       system, that necessarily involves coupling it to a MUCH LARGER measuring       instrument, and the comparatively tiny quantum system is "forced" into       an appropriate eigenstate by that coupling.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca