From: julio@diegidio.name   
      
   On Sunday, 2 October 2022 at 17:16:32 UTC+2, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)   
   wrote:   
   > In article <9fd7e23e-ede5-4185...@googlegroups.com>,   
   > Julio Di Egidio  writes:   
   > > On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 20:02:22 UTC+2, Thomas Koenig wrote:   
      
   > >> So, what is the general opinion on her article?   
   > >   
   > > Considering that the LHC has found no evidence for   
   > > supersymmetry, it is true/quite common sentiment (see   
   > > e.g. Arkani-Hamed), that particle physics is in a serious   
   > > crisis: and not just particle physics (GR vs QM, and so on).   
   >   
   > Yes, but Arkani-Hamed concludes from that that we need a bigger   
   > accelerator.   
      
   He happens to advocate for bigger accelerators, as well as   
   "bigger telescopes", only in so far as he generally advocates   
   for exploring extreme phenomena, but the gist of his work   
   and mission is theoretical and foundational, indeed, as he   
   puts it, for "ordinary physics":   
      
      
      
   So, he is certainly not on some chase for exotic particles, and   
   I rather mentioned him as a "champion" of radical change, i.e.   
   for those who think some radical change would be needed...   
      
   Julio   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)