Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,131 of 17,516    |
|    Austin Fearnley to All    |
|    Re: Nobel price physics 2022.    |
|    13 Oct 22 12:59:03    |
      From: ben6993@hotmail.com              On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:20:43 PM UTC+1, nicolaa... wrote:       [[Mod. note -- 40 excessively-quoted lines snipped here. -- jt]]                     I am an amateur physicist, just at the point of calling it a day. I have       a few days ago put online my final physics paper: on preons and Bell's       experiment. So I hope you allow this post as a swan song.              Of course the experimentalists have worked well for their prizes. But the       theoreticians still have work to do on this topic.                     In the late 1960s I read a book about quantum particles on the magical       world of Mr Tomkins. It was very exciting at the time but I now believe       it is very wrong physics. Particle entanglement of states is merely a sign       that calculations and observations cannot separate two items of raw data,       instead only the average is available. The raw data are not available for       entanglement, only the statistical, average value data are available.       Forget dead/alive cats as that is a distraction (and a waste of time).       Consider particles entangled with one another and with unknown spin       states. The most believable assumption in my opinion is that nothing       travels faster than light. Associated with this assumption is that       retrocausality is the key to this problem.              The implication of retrocausality is that quantum computers have no       foundation in physics as particle always have local hidden variables.       Also that time is two-way at the microscopic level. It is possible that       quantum cryptography is supported by retrocausality as there is an       apparent action at a distance despite nothing physically travelling faster       than light locally.              Austin Fearnley              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca