Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,150 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to All    |
|    Re: Newton's bucket    |
|    02 Nov 22 08:04:48    |
      From: tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 11/1/22 2:44 AM, xray4abc wrote:       > Centrifugal forces in rotational reference frames are not active       > forces but reactive forces.              No. Here's why:              Consider a mass with a rope attached, and you pull on the rope, straight       away from the mass -- i.e. you apply a force to the rope, which is       clearly an active force. The reactive force of Newton's third law is the       tension of the rope, generated by the inertia of the mass and the force       you applied to the rope. To apply Newton's laws, one must use an       inertial frame, and I am implicitly using one when I describe this       physical situation that way.              Now consider the exact same physical situation, but using rotating       coordinates. To be clear, no object is rotating, only the coordinates       are rotating. The active and reactive forces remain exactly the same       (because coordinates are a human construct that cannot possibly affect       any natural/physical phenomenon, such as forces). But if you want to       apply Newton's laws using those rotating coordinates, you must also       include "centrifugal, Coriolis, and Euler forces" -- these are purely       artifacts of using the rotating coordinates. They are not real in any       sense of the word, and they are not "reactive", they are FICTIONS       created by human mathematics in order to permit a human analyst to act       as if Newton's laws applied in the rotating coordinates.               [Note: I put "centrifugal, Coriolis, and Euler forces" in        "scare quotes" because those names are inappropriate and        lead all too many people to error. They are not really        forces, they are imaginary constructs of human minds.        But the names are solidly established historically.]              > The active force on any given point of a spinning object is the       > centripetal force imposed on it by the mass-points on the same       > radius ..namely the ONES which are closer to the rotational axis.       > The reaction force ,to the centripetal force exerted in-and-on this       > given point......is the so called centrifugal force.              No. The reactive force is the tension on whatever is exerting the       centripetal force on the object, and it is generated by the inertia of       the object and the centripetal force. The "centrifugal force" is purely       an artifact of the mathematics of using rotating coordinates -- mental       constructs of humans are not real.              > [... repetitions of the above]              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca