Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,168 of 17,516    |
|    Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston    |
|    Re: Neptune    |
|    18 Nov 22 18:14:08    |
      From: tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net              On 11/17/22 3:54 PM, Richard Livingston wrote:       > [...] the rotating coordinate frame is not an inertial reference       > frame.              True.              A minor point: in SR all possible frames are inertial, because "frame"       implies the coordinate axes are mutually orthogonal, and that only       happens for Minkowski coordinates at rest in an inertial frame. Rotating       and otherwise-accelerated coordinates do not have mutually orthogonal       coordinate axes.              > SR only applies in inertial frames.              False. SR applies in any coordinates if the physical situation is within       its domain of applicability. That domain is restricted to flat manifolds       with the topology of R^4, which means that gravitation is absent (or at       least negligible).              Note, however, that standard presentations of SR give equations only in       inertial coordinates (within its domain). To determine what equations       apply in rotating or otherwise-accelerated coordinates, one starts with       the usual equations in inertial coordinates and applies the appropriate       coordinate transform to the desired coordinates.              > Velocities in a rotating frame are not real and you can't use SR       > with these coordinates.              That is merely repeating the above mistake.              Tom Roberts              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca