INTL 1:1/130 1:229/2   
   REPLYADDR fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   
   REPLYTO 1:229/2.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  875527cc   
   REPLY:  f0612711   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   From: Luigi Fortunati    
   Newsgroups: sci.physics.research   
   Subject: Re: Apparent rotation   
   Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 00:15:52 PST   
   Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server   
   Lines: 20   
   Approved: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]"    
   Reply-To: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   
   X-Trace: individual.net evn8Ffd1TmQi7Do/D6gtWQvX/anx0NH4donuC3ECkK3+   
     pCZ3I5xVV11wbK   
   Cancel-Lock: sha1:jllbn8dKnwX6pGRL8fFEMPvZMXQ=   
   X-ICQ: 1931503972   
   X-Received-Bytes: 1548   
   From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   
      
   Phillip Helbigundress to reply giovedì 12/01/2023 alle ore 09:23:17 ha   
   scritto:   
   > But do such real rotations imply some sort of absolute space?   
      
   There is no absolute space and there is no absolute reference frame.   
      
   Space is not a reference frame, neither relative nor absolute.   
      
   The bodies are a reference frame, not the space.   
      
   Space doesn't stand still, it doesn't rotate, it doesn't accelerate.   
      
   They are the bodies that (in space) rotate, accelerate or remain inert   
   (inert, not still).   
      
   Every body is a reference frame.   
      
   The body without internal tensions is an inertial reference frame.   
      
   The body with internal tensions is an accelerated reference frame.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
   SEEN-BY: 229/2 400 426 700   
   PATH: 229/2 426