From: DGoncz@replikon.net   
      
   I think there are probably few sci.physics.research readers who are also   
   Microsoft Partners.  I am such. I am trying to get access to the new   
   Bing Chat interface.  I will report.   
      
   Chat GPT is currently down, overwhelmed by its own popularity.  I found   
   a workaround: for $5 monthly, I use Sparks, a GPT interface which is an   
   Alexa skill.  If you keep the workload light, Sparks stays connected.   
   Introduce your topic to GPT gradually, and it stays connected.  Jump in   
   with both feet first thing, and it just says it's really very sorry.   
      
   I intend to develop a Bing Chat skill of finding ODs, IDs, and   
   Circuferences of stock bearing, tubing, pipe, and magneti products that   
   facilitate postgraduate level research in experimental physics,   
   attacking the dual dimension / inch/metric problem head on, and using   
   the ISO Preferred Number Series E6, E12, etc, along with ad hoc   
   standards explorable by A.I., such as my favorite, dual dimenioned   
   bicycle product standards, and standards for say, SCH 40 6061-T6 PIPE   
   NOM 4 IN.   
      
   Cheers from Douglas   
   Replikon Research   
   Replikon.net   
      
      
      
      
   On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 4:00:17 PM UTC-5, Douglas Dana Edward^2   
   Parker-Goncz (fully) wrote:   
   > [[Mod. note -- I'm sorry for the delay in processing this article,   
   > which arrived in my s.p.r moderation inbox on 2023-02-06. -- jt]]   
   >   
   > Rich,   
   >   
   > I for one will explore magnetic anapole configurations that are highly   
   im-probable,   
   > using whatever comes from ChatGPT.   
   >   
   > And we will probably do some gedankens.   
   >   
   > Other than then, I dunno....   
   >   
   >   
   > Lord Dubhglas of Replikon Re-Search   
   > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 11:52:05 AM UTC-5, richali...@gmail.com   
   wrote:   
   >> On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 2:53:43 AM UTC-6, Douglas Dana Edward^2   
   Parker-Goncz (fully) wrote:   
   >>>>> long ChatGPT text delete, see previous post<<<   
   >>   
   >> That ChatGPT transcript was an interesting combination of partial   
   >> understanding, errors, wide range of knowledge, probably stock   
   >> boiler plate text, and occasional insights. While I would not be   
   >> impressed with this result from a competent human engineer, compared   
   >> to what any AI could do a decade ago I think this is very, very,   
   >> impressive. In another decade or two I would not be surprised if   
   >> these programs could compete or exceed a human engineer.   
   >>   
   >> And then what will people do?   
   >>   
   >> Rich L.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)