Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,278 of 17,516    |
|    Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation    |
|    28 Jul 23 13:52:58    |
      From: julio@diegidio.name              On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 09:38:07 UTC+2, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > Il giorno luned=C3=AC 24 luglio 2023 alle 18:52:50 UTC+2 Richard Livingston       ha scritto:              > > -During the turn-around, which we typically assume is almost       > > instantaneous, there is little change visible on earth.       >       > What are you saying? During the turn-around the spacecraft has to brake       > hard and then accelerate just as hard backwards and you say that in the       > images of his telescope, at this stage, there is little change visible on       > earth?              No, there is in fact no need for any of that: for the simplest form of twins       experiment just take SR in flat spacetime and compute the proper length       of the two path segments, and there already you have it: one of the two       paths is *shorter* (in terms of proper time/distance) than the other, and       that's it. And that experiment can even be really simulated, with *two*       rockets appropriately coordinated, one for each leg of the journey. So,       overall, it is true that acceleration concerns and even more so gravitational       effects are just *not germane to the twin paradoxes*.              > No! There is *big* change visible on earth,              No, there is no change at all on Earth expect for effects occurring       after any light goes from the travelling twin back to the one on Earth.       OTOH, the change of direction for the travelling twin does effect an       instantaneous change (for him), which is rather related to *rotation*       re the (his own) inertial path. There is a nice clip, by Brian Greene       IIRC, "the slices of bread", with the traveller going in a direction and       seeing a planet with its advanced technology, then the traveller inverts       direction and now sees the same planet in the middle ages: Greene       shows in pictures how the whole "jump in time" thing happens while       rotating (in space time), not earlier, not later...              You are totally grasping at straws, and necessarily so since you       have systematically disregarded all advice and corrections, all the       more so the methodological ones...              Julio              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca