Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,291 of 17,516    |
|    wugi to All    |
|    Re: The SR between reality and appearanc    |
|    07 Sep 23 11:03:57    |
      From: wugi@brol.invalid              Op 7/09/2023 om 7:52 schreef Luigi Fortunati:       > wugi il 05/09/2023 09:21:30 ha scritto:       >> ...       > Richard Livingston il 05/09/2023 06:01:20 ha scritto:       >> ...       >       > We obviously live in different worlds.       >       > In my world, a body that contracts, compresses.       >       > And a rigid body doesn't become flexible just because it's in motion.              You live in a still Newtonian world, not understanding relativity of       simultaneity and the length contraction and time dilation properties       that go with it. Absolute rigidity implies absolute simultaneity and       time (for a measurement to be "absolute"), which don't exist in SRT.              And as Mod. said, what with all those different observers who observe       all those different length contractions? Which "absolute" length       contraction is disturbing your rigidity considerations?                     > [[Mod. note --       > You are taking it for granted that the body does in fact contract       > or become flexible. But those observations are made by an observer       > who is not at rest with respect to the body!       >       > If observer A (at rest with body X) observes X to be uncontracted,       > and observer B1 (moving at velocity v1 with respect to X) observes X       > to be contracted by some amount R1, and observer B2 (moving at some       > different velocity v2 with respect to X) observes X to be contracted       > by some different amount R2, what should we infer? More generally,       > there are infinitely many possible observers B1, B2, B3, B4, ...,       > each of who will observe a different contraction of X.       >       > In special relativity, the answer is that we privilege observations       > made in the rest frame of the body being observed (in this case X).       >       > To put it another way, can you explain why you think it's paradoxical       > that observer B1 observes something different from observer A?       > -- jt]]              --       guido wugi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca