Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,520 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,292 of 17,520    |
|    Luigi Fortunati to All    |
|    Re: The SR between reality and appearanc    |
|    06 Sep 23 22:52:40    |
      From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com              wugi il 05/09/2023 09:21:30 ha scritto:       > ...       Richard Livingston il 05/09/2023 06:01:20 ha scritto:       > ...              We obviously live in different worlds.              In my world, a body that contracts, compresses.              And a rigid body doesn't become flexible just because it's in motion.              [[Mod. note --       You are taking it for granted that the body does in fact contract       or become flexible. But those observations are made by an observer       who is not at rest with respect to the body!              If observer A (at rest with body X) observes X to be uncontracted,       and observer B1 (moving at velocity v1 with respect to X) observes X       to be contracted by some amount R1, and observer B2 (moving at some       different velocity v2 with respect to X) observes X to be contracted       by some different amount R2, what should we infer? More generally,       there are infinitely many possible observers B1, B2, B3, B4, ...,       each of who will observe a different contraction of X.              In special relativity, the answer is that we privilege observations       made in the rest frame of the body being observed (in this case X).              To put it another way, can you explain why you think it's paradoxical       that observer B1 observes something different from observer A?       -- jt]]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca