Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,294 of 17,516    |
|    wugi to All    |
|    Re: The SR between reality and appearanc    |
|    10 Sep 23 13:37:40    |
      From: wugi@brol.invalid              Op 10/09/2023 om 10:30 schreef Luigi Fortunati:       >> [[Mod. note --       >> To put it another way, can you explain why you think it's paradoxical       >> that observer B1 observes something different from observer A?       >> -- jt]]       >       > I do not consider it paradoxical that observer B1 observes something       > different from observer A.       >       > I think it is paradoxical that observers B1 and A see different things       > both real: if one thing is real the other must be apparent and vice       > versa.              What a poor understanding of reality.              > This is why I speak of reality and appearance.              It's more common sense then to deny any form of reality. All observers       see appearances.              > A simple and clear example is the following.       >       > If observer B1 stands on the carousel, he sees the earth rotate a full       > 360 degrees in 5 seconds and sees the carousel stationary.       >       > Instead, observer A on the ground sees the carousel rotate 360 degrees       > in 5 seconds and sees dry land.       >       > One sees one thing, the other sees another: can both be real? Obviously       > not.              No indeed, "obviously" there are only appearances.              > If what observer A sees is real, what observer B1 sees can only be       > apparent.       >       > In fact, if the Earth really rotated at that angular velocity, it would       > shatter!              Would it? You forget that with Earth, the whole universe is rotating       around B1, so that ultimately it is only B1 who is feeling the "real"       rotational force acting upon them, from Earth + Universe.              When you look askew at an object, you will see it kind-of contracted, so       is that real or not? Do you only see the object "really" when looking at       it from a perpendicular view? In all other cases, will you infer stress       forces in the "contracted" objects?              Now try this kind of "observations" when time and movement come into       play, remembering for once relativity of simultaneity.              --       guido wugi              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca