Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,307 of 17,516    |
|    Mike Fontenot to Luigi Fortunati    |
|    Re: Twin watches    |
|    26 Sep 23 07:36:47    |
      From: mlfasf@comcast.net              On 9/23/23 3:09 PM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:       > Mike Fontenot wrote       >> ....       >       > I didn't quite understand your answer. lol       >              Here's what I wrote:               > [[Mod. note -- All observers can agree on        > (a) The events when the two clocks are next to each other, i.e., the       events        > when the carousel has made 0 revolutions (the starting event),       and when        > the carousel has made 1 complete revolution.        > (b) The two clock readings at an event when the two clocks are next       to each        > other. At the starting event both readings are 0. After one       complete        > revolution the readings are carousel=9, ground=10.        >        > So, the question to figure out is, how does the carousel observer obtain        > consistent results? I must confess that the answer isn't immediately        > obvious to me, [...]              I (Mike Fontenot, PhysicsFiddler@gmail.com ) said:              I don't see why you say there were any inconsistent results. The       results all looked fine to me. Could you elaborate?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca