Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,358 of 17,516    |
|    Luigi Fortunati to All    |
|    Re: Free fall    |
|    02 Feb 24 11:39:55    |
      From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com              Luigi Fortunati il 01/02/2024 01:44:37 ha scritto:       > [[Mod. note --       > The problem with the "magnetic free-fall" definition is that the       > acceleration differs from one metallic body to another. For example,       > a copper body will experience different magnetic forces -- and hence       > a different acceleration -- than an iron body.       >       > In contrast, with the standard definition of free-fall, free-fall is       > *universal*, i.e., *all* (non-spinning test) bodies have the same       > (zero) non-gravitational forces, and (experimentally) they all have       > the same free-fall acceleration.       > -- jt]]              Ok, let's call "free fall" only the gravitational one which is universal (the       same for everyone) and "non-free fall" the one with the addition of       electromagnetic acceleration.              On the scaffolding there are the painter and the metal robot (with the same       mass) and underneath there is an electromagnet with a force equal to the       gravitational one.              Obviously, the electromagnet only acts on the robot and not on the painter.              When they are on the scaffolding, the weight force of the robot is double       (despite having the same mass as the painter) because it is subject to two       forces: gravitational and electromagnetic.              When they fall, the robot's acceleration is double that of the painter because       it is generated by two forces instead of just one.              Therefore, let's call that of the painter "free fall" (without electromagnetic       acceleration) and that of the robot "non-free fall " (because there is the       addition of electromagnetic acceleration).              And now we see the effects of "free fall" and " non-free fall ".              In the "free fall" of the painter, Einstein says that the gravitational force       disappears (because it is not a real force) and I ask: does the gravitational       acceleration of the painter in free fall also disappear like the gravitational       force or does the        force disappear and not the acceleration ?              And during the robot's "non-free fall", which force (gravitational or       electromagnetic) disappears and which does not? And which acceleration       disappears and which does not?              Luigi Fortunati              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca