From: sylvia@email.invalid   
      
   On 16-Sept-24 3:01 pm, Luigi Fortunati wrote:   
   > I realize the enormity of the title of this article that refutes a law   
   > that is more than three centuries old and that has never been contested   
   > until now, but before presenting this work, I have carefully checked   
   > all the concepts, numbers and formulas and I am ready to present this   
   > article of mine in all other possible venues if it is rejected by   
   > Physics Review.   
      
   The only way to refute a theory without the use of experimental evidence   
   is to show that it is internally inconsistent.   
      
   Since you have provided neither experimental evidence nor a   
   demonstration of an internal inconsistency, what you've presented is not   
   a refutation.   
      
   Sylvia.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)