Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,427 of 17,516    |
|    Luigi Fortunati to All    |
|    Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong    |
|    20 Nov 24 07:39:34    |
      From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com              Arm wrestling: initially, hand A pushing to the right and hand B pushing to       the left are still because the action and reaction are equal and opposite.              If the two opposing forces remained *always* equal (as Newton's third law       states), they would never start moving to the right or even to the left: they       would remain eternally still.              Ibex A and B fight horns against horns and are still because the action of       ibex A to the right is perfectly equal and opposite to the reaction of ibex B       to the left: how could they both start moving (accelerate) to the right or to       the left if neither of        the two forces prevailed over the other? They couldn't and they would remain       eternally still!              Team A pulls the rope to the right with the same force with which team B pulls       it to the left and they remain still until when? Until the balance of the two       opposing forces is broken and one of the two forces prevails.              The rope between the horse and the stone moves with uniform speed until the       force of the horse pulling to the right is equal and opposite to the friction       of the stone on the ground pulling to the left but when its speed increases       (acceleration) the force        of the horse cannot be equal to the resistance of friction!              In short, the perfect balance between action and reaction exists only when the       two bodies (together) are still or move with uniform and rectilinear speed but       not when they accelerate!              The young student who comes across this discussion will ask himself: are these       simple considerations right or wrong?              Since they are contrary to the teachings he receives, he should immediately       think that Newton is right and, therefore, that these considerations must be       easily contestable by those who know more.              But then he would also ask himself: how come the discussion ran aground       without anyone being able to refute it?              And the doubt would remain.              Luigi Fortunati              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca