From: fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   
      
   On 4 Jul 2025 19:21:47 GMT, Tom Roberts    
   wrote:   
   > ...Cut...   
   >> Based on your other formulas, are the forces in the upper part of the   
   >> scheme correct or those in the lower part or are there others?   
   >   
   > His physical situation has no "upper part" or "lower part"; it is   
   > "1-dimensional motion". READ his post.   
      
   The upper or lower part does not concern "his physical situation" but   
   concerns my diagram https://www.geogebra.org/classic/d2bxrrmg that you   
   evidently do not even look at.   
      
   So, what value can your objections to my animations and diagrams have   
   if you do not even look at them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)