XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: kali@powder.keg   
      
   In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.   
   >   
   >He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.   
      
   You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is   
   obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.   
      
   >He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very   
   >well be a woman.   
      
   So could you, "Frank".   
      
   And I could be a man.   
      
   >At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so   
   >he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.   
      
   You're projecting again.   
      
   >He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.   
      
   Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself   
   presented, is hardly Peter's fault.   
      
   >Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is   
   >infatuated with them.   
      
   And you claim to know the history of the group?   
      
   --   
   Kali   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)