XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "Kali"  wrote in message   
   news:fu097s$7um$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>   
   >>"marcia"  wrote in message   
   >>news:635b4aaa-4a8e-4232-9756-29aca0faba46@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...   
   >>> On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >>>> "marcia"  wrote in message   
   >>>>   
   >>>> news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko  wrote:   
   >>>> >> On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called   
   >>>> >> sci.psychology.psychotherapy   
   >>>> >> and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> > "Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>>> >> >news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>> >> >> In , Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:   
   >>>> >> >>>Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >>>He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a   
   >>>> >> >>>nym.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is   
   >>>> >> >> obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >>>He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he"   
   >>>> >> >>>could   
   >>>> >> >>>very   
   >>>> >> >>>well be a woman.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> So could you, "Frank".   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> And I could be a man.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >>>At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and   
   >>>> >> >>>that   
   >>>> >> >>>was so   
   >>>> >> >>>he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> You're projecting again.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >>>He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame   
   >>>> >> >>>defense.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself   
   >>>> >> >> presented, is hardly Peter's fault.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >>>Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis,   
   >>>> >> >>>he   
   >>>> >> >>>is   
   >>>> >> >>>infatuated with them.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> And you claim to know the history of the group?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> > I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> > Are you Peter's mom?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> Peter has been here for far longer than you   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating   
   >>>> > back   
   >>>> > to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she   
   >>>> is   
   >>>> his   
   >>>> mom.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 12 years yet no provable education. :(   
   >>>   
   >>> I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC. You and Peter have   
   >>> certainly gotten off on the wrong foot, but really, he's a nice guy   
   >>> (believe it or not).   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Linda has been here as long as Peter, if time means anything.   
   >   
   > Linda has only been trolling spp since 2004.   
   >   
      
   Wrong, she's used nyms.   
      
   > She has won some really cool awards for being an spp asspimple.   
   >   
   > What does that make you?   
   >   
      
   Oh gee, is it possible for you to get lamer? I swear, for someone who is   
   supposed to be "educated, scientific, and intellectual" you astound me   
   with your lamers.   
      
   >> At this   
   >>point Peter has no degree's, and never will have since even if he did   
   >>he   
   >>wouldn't release the facts that would identify him/her.   
   >>Peter made a point of having absolute evidence as he cannot   
   >>rationalize   
   >>truths or realities. I will expect him to honor his high mark for   
   >>proof.   
   >>   
   >>> I like Kali, too, so you won't catch me dissing her. Last I heard   
   >>> she   
   >>> was very close to finishing her PhD, and may have done so by now,   
   >>> idk.   
   >>   
   >>Kali is a follower to her detriment, she leans on others from what   
   >>I've   
   >>seen and is far too sensitive emotionally. I doubt she can use a PhD   
   >>wisely, especially at her age. Very few grandmothers ever succeeded   
   >>when   
   >>a late PhD was earned. (Although I sincerely doubt that Peter can have   
   >>children)   
   >   
   > This was all predictable enough.   
   >   
      
   Not really, you tried to predict before and lost out.   
      
   Want to try again?   
      
   C'mon, astound us with your scientific brilliance, your deep insight,   
   your view of the future. lol   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)