XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "Kali"  wrote in message   
   news:fu2m1b$4s6$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>   
   >>"Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>news:fu097s$7um$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>> In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"marcia"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:635b4aaa-4a8e-4232-9756-29aca0faba46@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>>> On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >>>>>> "marcia"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.goo   
   legroups.com...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> > On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko    
   >>>>>> > wrote:   
   >>>>>> >> On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called   
   >>>>>> >> sci.psychology.psychotherapy   
   >>>>>> >> and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> > "Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> >> >news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>> >> >> In , Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:   
   >>>>>> >> >>>Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >>>He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is   
   >>>>>> >> >>>a   
   >>>>>> >> >>>nym.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It   
   >>>>>> >> >> is   
   >>>>>> >> >> obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >>>He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he"   
   >>>>>> >> >>>could   
   >>>>>> >> >>>very   
   >>>>>> >> >>>well be a woman.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> So could you, "Frank".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> And I could be a man.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >>>At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and   
   >>>>>> >> >>>that   
   >>>>>> >> >>>was so   
   >>>>>> >> >>>he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> You're projecting again.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >>>He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame   
   >>>>>> >> >>>defense.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself   
   >>>>>> >> >> presented, is hardly Peter's fault.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >>>Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis,   
   >>>>>> >> >>>he   
   >>>>>> >> >>>is   
   >>>>>> >> >>>infatuated with them.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >> And you claim to know the history of the group?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> > I've read some of the history and did a few specific   
   >>>>>> >> > searches.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> > Are you Peter's mom?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> Peter has been here for far longer than you   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> > At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood"   
   >>>>>> > dating   
   >>>>>> > back   
   >>>>>> > to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she   
   >>>>>> is   
   >>>>>> his   
   >>>>>> mom.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> 12 years yet no provable education. :(   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC. You and Peter have   
   >>>>> certainly gotten off on the wrong foot, but really, he's a nice   
   >>>>> guy   
   >>>>> (believe it or not).   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Linda has been here as long as Peter, if time means anything.   
   >>>   
   >>> Linda has only been trolling spp since 2004.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Wrong, she's used nyms.   
   >   
   > No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when Pablo started   
   > posting to spp. I was here the entire time, and I know this.   
   >   
      
   Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.   
      
   >>> She has won some really cool awards for being an spp asspimple.   
   >>>   
   >>> What does that make you?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Oh gee, is it possible for you to get lamer? I swear, for someone who   
   >>is   
   >>supposed to be "educated, scientific, and intellectual" you astound me   
   >>with your lamers.   
   >   
   > What does it say about you?   
   >   
      
   Are you Peter's mom?   
      
   >>>> At this   
   >>>>point Peter has no degree's, and never will have since even if he   
   >>>>did   
   >>>>he   
   >>>>wouldn't release the facts that would identify him/her.   
   >>>>Peter made a point of having absolute evidence as he cannot   
   >>>>rationalize   
   >>>>truths or realities. I will expect him to honor his high mark for   
   >>>>proof.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I like Kali, too, so you won't catch me dissing her. Last I heard   
   >>>>> she   
   >>>>> was very close to finishing her PhD, and may have done so by now,   
   >>>>> idk.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Kali is a follower to her detriment, she leans on others from what   
   >>>>I've   
   >>>>seen and is far too sensitive emotionally.   
   >   
   > LOL, Frank. Usenet Dr. Laura.   
   >   
      
   Is that a bad thing?   
      
   >> I doubt she can use a PhD   
   >>>>wisely, especially at her age. Very few grandmothers ever succeeded   
   >>>>when   
   >>>>a late PhD was earned. (Although I sincerely doubt that Peter can   
   >>>>have   
   >>>>children)   
   >>>   
   >>> This was all predictable enough.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Not really, you tried to predict before and lost out.   
   >>   
   >>Want to try again?   
   >>   
   >>C'mon, astound us with your scientific brilliance, your deep insight,   
   >>your view of the future. lol   
   >   
   > I prefer topical discussions in spp with people who know   
   > something about psychology, or at least, want to learn.   
   >   
      
   Hardly, you entered in a political discussion and changed the subject,   
   made your snide remarks and astounded us with your brilliant attacks yet   
   all the time pretending they never happened. I suppose senior moments   
   has its advantages.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)