1d7a7db6   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "marcia"  wrote in message   
   news:bb5ed41c-9d24-4229-8424-7fae10ebd849@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >> Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on   
   >> you.   
   >> It was sad, real sad.   
   >>   
   >> Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to   
   >> the   
   >> bottom of the barrel.   
   >   
   > Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost   
   > exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of   
   > spp.   
   >   
   > Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is "Wyatt   
   > Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*, and   
   > had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been   
   > fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)   
   >   
      
   A rather long commentary about her mentioned a name like Ehrenfels, I   
   don't remember there being a Wyatt attached.   
      
   > SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal itself   
   > in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what   
   > happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and   
   > can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what   
   > you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this group   
   > was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly   
   > respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.   
   >   
      
   It is amazing how many don't, it's huge out there.   
      
   >>   
   >> And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting   
   >> your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few   
   >> else.   
   >>   
   >> Sad, really sad.   
   >   
   > She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but   
   > one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and supportable   
   > discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's at   
   > least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've   
   > portrayed her at all.   
   >   
      
   She came off as a thoroughbred elitist snob her with nothing to   
   substantiate any claims. On the Web there were some comments about   
   unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were   
   mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.   
      
   Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of someone   
   who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a   
   scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true   
   intellectual like Bill Buckley is not very bright, not intelligent. One   
   does not have to agree with a persons political beliefs to recognize   
   well founded idea's and intelligent reasoning. Even Bills counterparts   
   respected him and thought well of him. Unless you speak of progressives   
   and they are all to agendized to see any truth anywhere and reasoning   
   has no place in their speech.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)