XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: kali@powder.keg   
      
   In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >   
   >"marcia"  wrote in message   
   >news:bb5ed41c-9d24-4229-8424-7fae10ebd849@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...   
   >> On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >>> Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on   
   >>> you.   
   >>> It was sad, real sad.   
   >>>   
   >>> Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to   
   >>> the   
   >>> bottom of the barrel.   
   >>   
   >> Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost   
   >> exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of   
   >> spp.   
   >>   
   >> Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is "Wyatt   
   >> Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*, and   
   >> had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been   
   >> fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)   
   >>   
   >   
   >A rather long commentary about her mentioned a name like Ehrenfels, I   
   >don't remember there being a Wyatt attached.   
      
   Gerald Giarmo, aka Whyatt Ehrenfels. Given the fact that you   
   have your nose shoved firmly up Linda's skirt, you should know   
   who that is.   
      
   >> SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal itself   
   >> in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what   
   >> happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and   
   >> can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what   
   >> you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this group   
   >> was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly   
   >> respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.   
   >>   
   >   
   >It is amazing how many don't, it's huge out there.   
      
   Just can't please all the people all of the time.   
      
   >>> And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting   
   >>> your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few   
   >>> else.   
   >>>   
   >>> Sad, really sad.   
   >>   
   >> She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but   
   >> one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and supportable   
   >> discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's at   
   >> least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've   
   >> portrayed her at all.   
   >>   
   >   
   >She came off as a thoroughbred elitist snob   
      
   "Thoroughbred elitist snob"? lol   
      
   > her with nothing to   
   >substantiate any claims.   
      
   My claims were well substantiated. You snipped out all the   
   evidence and ran away from the thread.   
      
   > On the Web there were some comments about   
   >unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were   
   >mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.   
   >   
   >Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of someone   
   >who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a   
   >scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true   
   >intellectual like Bill Buckley   
      
   Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of   
   reading comprehension skills don't count, here.   
      
   > is not very bright, not intelligent. One   
   >does not have to agree with a persons political beliefs to recognize   
   >well founded idea's and intelligent reasoning. Even Bills counterparts   
   >respected him and thought well of him. Unless you speak of progressives   
   >and they are all to agendized to see any truth anywhere and reasoning   
   >has no place in their speech.   
      
   Poor Frank.   
      
   --   
   Kali   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)