XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "Kali"  wrote in message   
   news:fu8sf0$454$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>   
   >>"Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>> In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>>>>> On the Web there were some comments about   
   >>>>>>unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were   
   >>>>>>mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of   
   >>>>>>someone   
   >>>>>>who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a   
   >>>>>>scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true   
   >>>>>>intellectual like Bill Buckley   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of   
   >>>>> reading comprehension skills don't count, here.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.   
   >>>   
   >>> You're the one making the claim. Prove it.   
   >>>   
   >>>> It'll show up,   
   >>>>I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?   
   >>>   
   >>> What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,   
   >>> and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true   
   >>intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me   
   >>yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?   
   >   
   > What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I   
   > read the whole thing.   
   >   
   >>On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.   
   >>D.   
   >   
   > Actually he did, I had him mixed up with someone else.   
   >   
   >> I have yet to see where you achieved the same   
   >   
   > That's okay with me. Think what you want.   
   >   
      
   Yawn   
      
   > Your name, address, phone number, real estate information, tax   
   > information, current employer, and academic background would be   
   > required first, just to level the playing field, "Frank".   
   >   
      
   "Kimberley"   
      
   > But then I still won't post anything about my personal or   
   > professional life to Usenet again. I shared just enough to get   
   > myself stalked and harassed at school and at work several years   
   > ago by people like you.   
   >   
      
   Now you sound just like Linda. You're saying people just like me?   
      
   If that be so then you are indeed not just foolish, but just plain   
   stupid for playing with fire. You should never had started in the first   
   place. Now I have not stalked you, nor even bothered to look up your   
   address or anything but I am not surprised, granny's always assume   
   someone is after them for their looks or money, shrug, who knows? Seems   
   a little paranoia goes a long ways for making them feel desired.   
   Paranoia and narcissism, what nice companions, eh?   
      
   Here's another clue for the clueless, just the act of posting gives away   
   a lot of personal details, especially when you "open" up for friends or   
   your son Peter, things better said on the tele.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)