XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, soc.men   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "Kali"  wrote in message   
   news:fu8sf0$454$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>   
   >>"Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>> In , Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:   
   >>>>>> On the Web there were some comments about   
   >>>>>>unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were   
   >>>>>>mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of   
   >>>>>>someone   
   >>>>>>who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a   
   >>>>>>scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true   
   >>>>>>intellectual like Bill Buckley   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of   
   >>>>> reading comprehension skills don't count, here.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.   
   >>>   
   >>> You're the one making the claim. Prove it.   
   >>>   
   >>>> It'll show up,   
   >>>>I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?   
   >>>   
   >>> What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,   
   >>> and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true   
   >>intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me   
   >>yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?   
   >   
   > What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I   
   > read the whole thing.   
   >   
      
   Then your reply was to what you read. No need to go back all over again.   
   You do a lot of projecting, PKB's all over the place. I'm just picking   
   this one up as an example and poking a stick in your eye at the same   
   time. You just tacitly admitted disdain for what I write, which also   
   shows why your comprehension goes way down. Yet you expect others to   
   follow your every word and thought and when they point out your errors   
   you assume they are doing the same.   
      
   You accused me of having disdain for intellectuals, lol, poor reading   
   comprehension. Projections all.   
   Your stating my disdain for intellectuals I thought rather strange. I of   
   course was not considering you one, given that you like to use a tit for   
   tat based on your misperceptions.   
      
   >>On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.   
   >>D.   
   >   
   > Actually he did, I had him mixed up with someone else.   
   >   
      
   Senior moments? How time flies.   
      
   >> I have yet to see where you achieved the same   
   >   
   > That's okay with me. Think what you want.   
   >   
      
   Wow, and you claim to have at least minimal reading comprehension?   
      
   Enjoy your curds and whey.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)