2acddd57   
   XPost: alt.support.tourette, alt.support.depression.medication   
   From: fafa@fafafa.fafa   
      
   Linda wrote:   
   > On Jul 4, 5:43 am, The Central Scrutinizer    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Ah, I see.  You weren't making impotent threats of police action or jail   
   >> time.  You were making impotent threats about lawsuits.   
   >   
   >   
   > What's new?   
   >   
   > There have unindicted criminals publishing malicious messages to   
   > everything I post whose intention is to isolate,  monopolize the   
   > perceptions,  debilitate and exhaust,  threaten, demonstrate the   
   > unindicted criminals omniscience and omnipotence,  occaisionally   
   > indulge,  degrade,  and/or enforce trivial demands upon me,  IOW,   
   > torture me day after day,  week after week,  month after month,  and   
   > year after year for the last eight years.   
   >   
   > My having been apprised these unindicted criminals recklessly   
   > endangered my life by authorities in NJ in 2001,  and,  my having   
   > filed a criminal complaint about the threat to the lives of myself and   
   > my child(ren) with local authorities in 2002,  and,  my having granted   
   > permission to fellow crime victims more articulate then yours truly to   
   > list me as a victim and witness of activities which in aggregate   
   > constitute unlawful torture of americans in a criminal complaint filed   
   > with the FBI in 2005,  and,  granted the same individuals permission   
   > to do likewise in a report prepared for members of the US Congress,   
   > incites me to check to see if law enforcement agencies have arrested   
   > these criminals yet,  and,  when I'm disappointed to note most of the   
   > unindicted criminals are STILL free and at large,  I ignore the fact   
   > they are STILL free and at large rather then a prison cell and or   
   > executed for the treason they've been committing.   
   >   
   > Their continued presence years after the whole lousy rotten bunch of   
   > rhem ought to have been locked in prison is prima facia evidemce of   
   > democratic and republican leaders colluded in treason perpetrated   
   > against we the people.   
   >   
   > The Treason would have had to been the product of  collusion between   
   > both parties,  because,  whilst Cheney authored the 1992 memo   
   > outlining the blueprint for the Treasonous Progect for a New American   
   > Century which asserted the  degradation and dominance of cyberspace   
   > was essential,  Seligmans and Koochers Psychopathic Spooks weren't   
   > deployed to make it happen until Seligman was installed as the Pres of   
   > the APA in the mid nineties during the Clinton administration.   
   >   
   > Democrats grandstanding wrt torture would have the world believe such   
   > torture began on 09/11/01,  when it's obvious to anyone witheir eyes   
   > wide open the US program of torture was kicked off in the mid 90's   
   > against denizens of cyberspace,  primarily americans as that time, in   
   > order to effect the degradation and dominance of cyberspace which the   
   > treasonous Project for a New American Century.   
   >   
   >   
   > If the democrats and republicans collude to give these criminals   
   > immunity, on top of the exorbitant cost of gas and food etal,   I   
   > think both parties best be prepared to be run out of office,   
   > because,  those 40% of independents will be swelled to 70-80% by   
   > defectors from both parties,  which will include everyone but those   
   > employed by the pathocracy.   
      
   So the unindicted criminals who recklessly endangered your life in NJ in   
   2001 are the same bunch who began the torture on 09/11/01 and they're   
   all led by Dick Cheney??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)