From: spurge@erbs.moc   
      
   "Frank"  wrote in message news:g6obkk$av1$1@aioe.org...   
   >   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:1d4e26fb-6e99-47ea-9fba-a63c1192891f@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Jul 27, 12:10 pm, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >>>  wrote in message   
   >   
   >>>Most of my "multiple complaints" can be objectively proven   
   >>>and evidence of malicious intent is overwhelming.   
   >>   
   >>And then there is, of course, the fact that Michael   
   >>Aquino is alleged to be a serial killer as well as   
   >>a child molester, and he clearly hired Michelle   
   >>Devereaux to locate me.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I know nothing of Michael A, although for whatever reason I sure have seen   
   > his name mention often on the Net. I know little of Michelle, just from   
   > what I've read on and off here, and nowhere did I ever see that she was a   
   > detective. Truth be known I do not really know what she did or where.   
   > However if he hired her to locate you then what would that have to do with   
   > any fraudulent report. Besides, what difference does it make if anyone was   
   > located unless they were doing undercover work?   
   >   
   >>   
   >>I viewed several internal Criminal Investigative   
   >>Tapes from the army which were given to researcher   
   >>Dale McCulley, as well as an audio tape, and many   
   >>of the children described murderous acts that were   
   >>committed. (I have one of these CID tapes which   
   >>Aquino is welcome to dispute.) Of course, Mr. Aquino   
   >>was then processed out of the Army in 1990. Then   
   >>there is all of the other evidence: John de Camp's   
   >>book, Cathy O'briens book, Paul Bonacci's testimony,   
   >>Noreen Gosch's testimony. I am looking forward to   
   >>all of this information coming out in this   
   >>present Federal proceeding.   
   >>   
   >   
   > If Michael A. is a murderer, especially of children, then I wish you all   
   > the best in bringing out the truth. There is no statute of limitations   
   > regarding murder. I seriously doubt that the US Army would condone murder   
   > and I really don't see how this all plays out regarding your life. I have   
   > read your personal statement from years ago when you were sentenced and it   
   > did not make a whole lot of sense to me at the time there seems to be a   
   > lot of facts missing and yet to be presented.   
   > Some serial-killer types like to play with their   
   > victims.   
   >   
   >>So I believe I have lots of evidence of motive   
   >   
   > Let's hope there is a whole lot more than that. I can present you with   
   > more than enough evidence that I would like to do something illegal,   
   > perhaps massive amounts of motives, most justified. As long as I do not   
   > act on it I am safe, untouchable and legal.   
   >   
   >>"Frank."   
   >>   
   >   
   > Are you know disputing my name? Should I yours? Seems there were a few   
   > posting here who claimed to be you at one time or another.   
      
   Don't waste your time Frank. She probably sees devils on the screen whenever   
   you respond to her.   
      
   Not too tightly wrapped.   
      
   >>Diana Napolis   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)