From: spurge@erbs.moc   
      
   "Frank"  wrote in message news:g6tjhe$3jh$1@aioe.org...   
   >   
   > "Allgeheny Spurge"  wrote in message   
   > news:g6sscj$r7v$1@aioe.org...   
   >>   
   >> "Frank"  wrote in message news:g6r2im$j56$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Allgeheny Spurge"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:g6qhki$rnm$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>> "Frank"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:g6ocdr$f6s$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Allgeheny Spurge"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:g6o737$jbc$1@aioe.org...   
   >>>>>> diananapolis0@gmail.com> wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:093efe66-928d-4492-be53-fd3c88609fbc@j7g2000prm.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>>>> On Jul 28, 6:30 pm, diananapol...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Barratry is an offense, Curio. Remember that. It could save your mad   
   >>>>>> ass.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> California Penal Code Section 158: "Common barratry is the practice of   
   >>>>> exciting groundless judicial proceedings, and is punishable by   
   >>>>> imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months and by fine   
   >>>>> not   
   >>>>> exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000)."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> California Penal Code Section 159: "No person can be convicted of   
   >>>>> common   
   >>>>> barratry except upon proof that he has excited suits or proceedings at   
   >>>>> law   
   >>>>> in at least three instances, and with a corrupt or malicious intent to   
   >>>>> vex   
   >>>>> and annoy."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Not much of an admonishment.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Prior historical evidence would play into this as well.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I can see Jennifer Love Hewitt and Spielberg playing the part of   
   >>>> witness,   
   >>>> special effects of devils, heavenly choirs, members of Stargate command   
   >>>> (me), lots of folk called Beta and Theta, the whole show. Plus a coupla   
   >>>> cute lil devils. ;)   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>    ;) , I love the part of 159 which says, "has excited suits". Many.   
   >>> many ways of defining that one least of which is really excited ala big   
   >>> time show attorneys. Legal definition is much more mundane.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Hey careful now, Diana might want to find herself an excited soot, what   
   >> with getting no ??? at all. ;)   
   >>   
   >> Anyhow, I think she has 2 major probs; 1 money 2 evidence. Aint' no   
   >> devils here. Ain't no serial killers here. I think Diana is up to her old   
   >> games online, only this time we know for sure who she is, and we know the   
   >> details of her psychiatrist. :)   
   >   
   > I was rather looking forward to the first hearing, not happy about the   
   > extra costs for the people involved though. I saw no evidence, neither now   
   > nor when she first posted her reply to the court. A lot of unsubstantiated   
   > goobly gook intertwined with voodoo mind games.   
   >   
   > All these years, and all for naught. :(   
      
   The guy in T1 had a technical term for her; as nutty as a froot kake. She   
   needs to be protected by the psychiatric system before she harms herself or   
   someone else IRL who might retalaiate and hurt her back. IRL you can't get   
   away with the sort of shit she does, calling people pedos, devil   
   worshippers, serial killers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)