XPost: alt.horror.cthulhu
From: dawgface@ten.hut
"Comm" wrote in message
news:z6GdnWTnHbjwpFzVnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>I would love to know who this is - posting a message and pretending to
>be -
> ME! Well, I can't object to anything that was said. But it's damned
> confusing, that's for sure. That, plus I can't see all the posts
> except for
> replies to them.
>
Then that could explain why two socks are posting as you.
> Please see inside.
>
Let's see if you dare go there. ;)
> "Frank" wrote in message
> news:g9q5hd$li1$1@aioe.org...
>>
>>
>> You are not very bright, are you? You lack reading comprehension,
>> outed
>> yourself as Tani, whoever the hell that is, and attributed things in
>> the
>> post to me that belonged to another. Unless you are just paranoid and
>> see
>> boogey men behind every tree and can utilize that in a court case you
>> better have a damn good lawyer and keep your mouth shut at all times.
>
> LMAO, don't even go there - I'm quite bright, but I can't stand
> organized
> religion, especially the kind that bothers others and tries to convert
> them.
> Especially their sickening hellfire and brimstone emotional blackmail.
> I have good reading comprehension, but this series of posts is very
> confusing. It would appear that someone posted something as if they
> were
> me - and I can't really see WHO posted some of the lines. It's not
> showing
> up.
>
So how do you tell who is "organized" and who isn't? Plus you might want
to try another news server.
> I'm also being harassed like hell by some god damned anon poster
> posting
> libelous shit about someone you just might know, from the looks of it,
> on
> your newsgroup.
>
I haven't seen anything here remotely similar to harrasement, libel,
possibly.
> What court case? OH, the "big fan of Jennifer Love Hewett's" court
> case?
>
> Puleese. This is USENET. I.e., the sewer.
>
Your "noted" friend Curio's lawsuit.
>>
>> You can ask "any Jew" and get as many different answers as there were
>> Jews
>> you spoke to.
>>
>> Most haven't a clue.
>
> Well, what I can see on this thread is a bunch of very good posts with
> JEWISH AUTHORITY information on there. I gotta copy that - it's good
> info.
> So go see what Jewish authority has to say since Jews were right there
> at
> the time. The 4 "apostles" weren't, none of the authors of the NT
> were
> there. Jews were there. They ARE the authorities on this issue;
> their word
> is solid. It's their religion.
>
Four apostles? LOL, what religion is that?
All the disciples were Jews, all the Apostles were Jews, 13 recognized
apostles as I recall. All were there at the time, so according to your
latest creative discernment they all met with the critieria you
establish 2+eons after the fact. Fact of the matter is that the "New
Testament" was directed to and for Jews/Hebrews.
Fact: The vast majority of early day Christians were Jews/Hebrews.
Fact: It was for the Jew first, then the gentile.
Fact: Had you read the New Testament you would have known this.
> I could care less what your religion is, or what religions you like.
> I was
> posting what I posted to Al Smith. But the cross posting was started
> by an
> anon bastard troll libeling the shit out of me and trying to provoke a
> person that was institutionalized to do me harm. GOT IT?
>
> Tani.
>
Sorry for the interference of your love affair with Al Smith. The two of
you deserve each other from what I read, neither knows or understands
what they are talking about and you remind me of an old crotchety
married couple bagging on each other. GOT IT?
Feel free about going back to your nirvana of ignorance.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
