0999c539
XPost: alt.support.attn-deficit, alt.support.tourette
From: dawgface@ten.hut
"marcia" wrote in message
news:1546ddee-8335-4251-a960-e399c0540911@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 31, 6:57 pm, "Frank" wrote:
>> "marcia" wrote in message
>>
>> news:f2d00f2e-998b-435e-94ab-1f61996de0f3@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 29, 7:58 pm, Jo wrote:
>> >> On Oct 29, 8:39 am, marcia wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Oct 28, 10:32 pm, "Frank" wrote:
>>
>> >> > > Sounds great, right? Take from those that have and give to
>> >> > > those
>> >> > > that
>> >> > > don't.
>>
>> >> > > Let people make as much as they can then take it from them?
>> >> > > Gives
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > person a real incentive to achieve, right?
>>
>> >> > > Ok, let's say we confiscate all the wealth of those that made
>> >> > > more than
>> >> > > 250 thousand in a year, and then redistribute all that money
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > "less fortunate". Guess what, before the year would be up
>> >> > > there
>> >> > > would be
>> >> > > no money left to give away. So now you would have people
>> >> > > leaving
>> >> > > the US
>> >> > > to go somewhere, anywhere but here, where they get to keep
>> >> > > something of
>> >> > > what they made.
>>
>> >> > > You cannot make slaves out of rich people, they simply will
>> >> > > not
>> >> > > stand
>> >> > > for it. You do not see Oprah giving most of her money away,
>> >> > > nor
>> >> > > do you
>> >> > > see Obama's "friend" Buffett giving his away, at least not
>> >> > > yet.
>> >> > > Neither
>> >> > > of them is willing to work for another and irony of irony
>> >> > > Oprah
>> >> > > an
>> >> > > actress made famous by her role as a slave would now be made a
>> >> > > slave by
>> >> > > Obama so she would have to "share" her wealth with all the
>> >> > > poor,
>> >> > > black
>> >> > > and white alike and work for the "man" for the rest of her
>> >> > > life.
>>
>> >> > > Obama, the poor cannot afford you.
>>
>> >> > Your basic premise is flawed. Obama plans to allow the Bush tax
>> >> > cuts
>> >> > for the rich to EXPIRE so that they are paying the same rate as
>> >> > they
>> >> > were under the Clinton administration, which is nowhere near
>> >> > 100%,
>> >> > or
>> >> > even the draconian 70% it was prior to Reagan. The first tax
>> >> > group
>> >> > increases by approximately 4%. That money will be used to help
>> >> > fund
>> >> > tax cuts for the poor and MIDDLE CLASS.
>>
>> >> > Considering our bail out tax dollars are currently being used to
>> >> > pay
>> >> > bonuses to the wealthy bankers who helped tank our economy, I
>> >> > think
>> >> > this is more than fair. A gift, even.
>>
>> >> > Even Joe Scarborough (Republican talk show host) says the tax
>> >> > increase
>> >> > isn't as bad as he expected.
>>
>> >> > Geez, Frank. I expected better from you than pure Republican
>> >> > propaganda.
>>
>> >> > FACTCHECK.ORG is your friend.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> Thanks for setting Frank straight- that argument he made is quite
>> >> incorrect and I'm suprised people still buy that 'redistribution"
>> >> nonsense. Jo
>>
>> > Frank is acting like a crazy, racist wing-nut these days. I think
>> > he's
>> > scared Obama will be elected. People still buy into a lot of the
>> > Republican nonsense; if it makes you sick, stay away from Craig's
>> > List. :)
>>
>> Marcia, are you so little as to see racism behind everything? Can I
>> not
>> call someone stupid because they are black? Can I not call them an
>> idiot
>> or a marxist if that is what they are?
>>
>> You have so little to back up your thinking that you just have to
>> sidetrack to a racist thing to back up a poor argument?
>>
>> I am against the man, what he is, and what he stands for, the shell
>> he
>> lives in makes little difference, at least to me. Sorry to hear that
>> you
>> are such a latent racist. Seems most democrats are. :(
>
> Where did I use the word "racist," Frank? Where? Looks to me like the
> only one who said "racist" was you, in your response to me, in this
> post: 3 times. Check for yourself.
>
"Frank is acting like a crazy, racist wing-nut these days. I think he's
scared Obama will be elected. People still buy into a lot of the
Republican nonsense; if it makes you sick, stay away from Craig's
List. :)"
> Obama is no Marxist; such ludicrous statements would be amusing except
> for the fact that you actually *believe* that sh*t. You've bought into
> the Republican propaganda big time. Try checking your facts somewhere
> other than the Heritage Foundation and other known right-wing
> propaganda machines. Sheesh!
He is a marxist, do a little research on your own, please. There is
another term they also use of it, something like black liberation
theology, their roots are marxist, their slogans taken straight our of
the marxist doctrines. They are control freaks, kicking anyone who
disagrees with them in the slightest out of their planes, out of their
lives. They belittle the "little people", red necks, workers and so on,
even the people who have not the power to do anything other than
disagree with them they will pursue to the ends of the earth in order to
besmirch them, ridicule them and destroy their lives. If this is going
on now, just wait until after they are elected.
Right now they are also in protect mode regarding the housing fiasco, if
elected you will not see the fiasco dealt with other than repeated
finger pointing at the Rep's, yet only the Dem's had anything to do with
that fiasco.
Oh, and I never read the Heritage Foundation or any other right-wing
organizations, although I do hear that they back up their words with
facts, something no democratic organization can seldom do. 90% of the
news media is propagandizing the news and readily admit to it, news orgs
that you no doubt read.
However, when you pay higher prices because of increased corp. taxes,
don't worry, be happy, they really aren't taxing you directly now are
they?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
