471fcbc5   
   XPost: alt.support.attn-deficit, alt.support.tourette   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "marcia"  wrote in message   
   news:aaaf5798-ee57-4ae2-9768-dbaac19005cf@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Nov 2, 12:00 am, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >> "John Palmer"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:ro8qg49pnhqiddq2q3jgcgr394m2prbouk@4ax.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:34:04 -0700, "Frank"    
   >> > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >>"John Palmer"  wrote in message   
   >> >>news:bqqpg4dlpr5mgdarfmbdb3r7riupmp5q0a@4ax.com...   
   >> >>>>It wasn't under regulated, it was under monitored. All the regs   
   >> >>>>were   
   >> >>>>there and still are.   
   >>   
   >> >>> Okay, so, that's how you argue? By just making shit up, and   
   >> >>> insisting   
   >> >>> that it's right? Fair enough; no point in wasting my time, then.   
   >>   
   >> >>> John Palmer   
   >>   
   >> >>Make up whatever you want, back out on your own terms so you cannot   
   >> >>lose?   
   >>   
   >> >>ROTFL!   
   >>   
   >> >>The regulations were there, check them out, why do you think that   
   >> >>Freddie may or whatever was deemed corrupt?   
   >>   
   >> > If you can't even spell the names of the bit players you're trying   
   >> > to   
   >> > pretend are big, you're not going to have any credibility.   
   >>   
   >> > For the record: It's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.   
   >>   
   >> I never deal with them and they are far from my mind, but thanks for   
   >> pointing out the corrected names. as to pretending names are big?   
   >> what a   
   >> joke, they were players and the one at the top quite before he was   
   >> charged and is a supporter in Obamas campaign, a benefactor and   
   >> financial advisor. blind leading the blind and all that.   
   >   
   > The point is, if you don't know the names are Fannie Mae and Freddie   
   > Mac, you obviously don't know too much about them, or, by extension,   
   > the rest of the current financial crisis. If you'd read even a little   
   > about either business, you wouldn't have screwed up the names. You   
   > seem to have a problem acknowledging when you're wrong.   
      
   Don't bother projecting yourself here Marcia, I admitted the spelling   
   and mixing of names.   
   I don't have business with either, and do not invest in either because   
   they were typically low yield. I have others who do that sort of thing   
   for me so I don't have to bother with certain particulars. That does not   
   lessen the fact that I am correct about the mismanagement and corruption   
   that went on. You can chose to ignore the facts and hide your head in   
   the sand, oh WAIT, you are already doing that by choosing Obama. :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)