e7701160   
   XPost: alt.support.attn-deficit, alt.support.tourette   
   From: dawgface@ten.hut   
      
   "marcia"  wrote in message   
   news:1159722c-48b9-4ecd-9f41-15622c0dfb7b@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Nov 1, 11:56 pm, "Frank"  wrote:   
   >> "stanw"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:caab1e5c-5533-4508-ad5f-6f999e64a65f@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> > WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU SAW A HOUSE BUILT FROM THE ROOF DOWN?   
   >>   
   >> >> A few weeks ago actually, really.   
   >>   
   >> >    You saw a house being built from the top down?  What, are you   
   >> > the   
   >> > kindergartener with cookie crumbs on his chin and a chocolate stain   
   >> > on   
   >> > his hands and collar who "swears" he "didn't take a cookie!!!!!".   
   >>   
   >> >     Talk about spite.  Marcia's analogy is quite apt.  Neither   
   >> > you -   
   >> > nor ANY one - has *ever* or COULD ever build a house from the top   
   >> > down.  Nope.  Can't ever be done.  Nope, even if, by some lunacy   
   >> > you   
   >> > build it in layers and stack it on some scaffolding "top first" -   
   >> > the   
   >> > contact to the ground, either via the scaffolding or a crane or, as   
   >> > I   
   >> > suspect, the lower floors, the fact remains that the ground   
   >> > supports   
   >> > everything else and, thus, it is built FROM THE GROUND UP.   
   >>   
   >> >    -stan   
   >>   
   >> LOL, really frosts your cake, eh?   
   >>   
   >> Tell you what, I can build a house from the top down. I choose the   
   >> location, materials, etc. you pay for the costs if I can do it, plus   
   >> a   
   >> percentage of profit at my discretion. I also hold all rights of   
   >> design,   
   >> and benefit from any publicity arising out of it. I can build it so   
   >> that   
   >> it never touches the ground or so that when it is complete it will be   
   >> set on the ground. You must first prove you have the wherewithal to   
   >> pay   
   >> for the costs whether it be a one room abode of multiple.   
   >   
   > What? They've repealed the laws of gravity where you live?   
   >   
   > Just because you declare you can circumvent standard building   
   > construction (without providing any details for us to laugh at)   
   > doesn't mean your point is correct. It's not. You're just being a   
   > contrarian.   
      
   You are both being ridiculous, as well as ignorant about how such things   
   are done. I brought up the bird house/nest to provide an easy clue for   
   both of you, and damn, it is staring you both in the face and you still   
   cannot see it, about as bad as neither seeing the truth about Obama.   
      
   You let me worry about "breaking the laws of gravity" lol, and cough up   
   the money, I'll cut the costs down by just building on small room fully   
   roofed, build it from a balloon if I must, but that will raise the costs   
   considerably, but I can do it without any slight of hand or tricks.   
      
   So lay out the parameters ahead of time so there will be no argument   
   about it or the finances upon my completion.   
      
   Oh and please do explain Obama's trickle up BS. That just has to be one   
   of the dumbest things he has ever said. The poor fella is a bit daft,   
   but he can read fairly will, hence the teleprompters.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)