46d89796
XPost: alt.support.attn-deficit, alt.support.tourette
From: dawgface@ten.hut
"marcia" wrote in message
news:a5b8a293-b936-4a5d-8890-f5601b585402@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 2, 3:47 pm, "Frank" wrote:
>> "marcia" wrote in message
>>
>> news:aaaf5798-ee57-4ae2-9768-dbaac19005cf@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 2, 12:00 am, "Frank" wrote:
>> >> "John Palmer" wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:ro8qg49pnhqiddq2q3jgcgr394m2prbouk@4ax.com...
>>
>> >> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:34:04 -0700, "Frank"
>> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> >>"John Palmer" wrote in message
>> >> >>news:bqqpg4dlpr5mgdarfmbdb3r7riupmp5q0a@4ax.com...
>> >> >>>>It wasn't under regulated, it was under monitored. All the
>> >> >>>>regs
>> >> >>>>were
>> >> >>>>there and still are.
>>
>> >> >>> Okay, so, that's how you argue? By just making shit up, and
>> >> >>> insisting
>> >> >>> that it's right? Fair enough; no point in wasting my time,
>> >> >>> then.
>>
>> >> >>> John Palmer
>>
>> >> >>Make up whatever you want, back out on your own terms so you
>> >> >>cannot
>> >> >>lose?
>>
>> >> >>ROTFL!
>>
>> >> >>The regulations were there, check them out, why do you think
>> >> >>that
>> >> >>Freddie may or whatever was deemed corrupt?
>>
>> >> > If you can't even spell the names of the bit players you're
>> >> > trying
>> >> > to
>> >> > pretend are big, you're not going to have any credibility.
>>
>> >> > For the record: It's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
>>
>> >> I never deal with them and they are far from my mind, but thanks
>> >> for
>> >> pointing out the corrected names. as to pretending names are big?
>> >> what a
>> >> joke, they were players and the one at the top quite before he was
>> >> charged and is a supporter in Obamas campaign, a benefactor and
>> >> financial advisor. blind leading the blind and all that.
>>
>> > The point is, if you don't know the names are Fannie Mae and
>> > Freddie
>> > Mac, you obviously don't know too much about them, or, by
>> > extension,
>> > the rest of the current financial crisis. If you'd read even a
>> > little
>> > about either business, you wouldn't have screwed up the names. You
>> > seem to have a problem acknowledging when you're wrong.
>>
>> Don't bother projecting yourself here Marcia, I admitted the spelling
>> and mixing of names.
>> I don't have business with either, and do not invest in either
>> because
>> they were typically low yield. I have others who do that sort of
>> thing
>> for me so I don't have to bother with certain particulars. That does
>> not
>> lessen the fact that I am correct about the mismanagement and
>> corruption
>> that went on. You can chose to ignore the facts and hide your head in
>> the sand, oh WAIT, you are already doing that by choosing Obama. :)
>
> I don't have any business dealings with, or investments in, Fannie Mae
> or Freddie Mac, either, but I CAN READ. Anyone who has read enough to
> know about the originS of the current economic crisis would remember
> such minor "particulars" as the names of the companies he accused of
> CAUSING THE DEBACLE, despite the fact that they didn't.
Ok, supposing I come up with all the proof, the statements of Obama, the
queer that lies so oft, the copies of the proposal that McCain put forth
to the committee, and I can with a little research, would you be willing
to change your mind about Obama and the Democrats? Would you be willing
to acknowledge that the actions or inactions of the Democrats with full
knowledge was the major cause of this collapse? Add to that the high
price of oil due to their shutting down the oil supplies from this
country and all the related projects, including nuclear power?
Don't bother with the game of yes, if I provide all these things before
Tuesday, because if you read as you say you do, and you seek the truth
as you allude to then you already know these things and that I am
correct.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
