XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.2600
XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, sci.med, alt.fucknozzles
XPost: alt.religion
From: thisemail@isamunge.com
On 2/13/09 10:19 PM, in article gn5ddu$k4q$1@news.motzarella.org, "Dead
Kitten" wrote:
> MillerT wrote:
>> On 2/13/09 5:07 PM, in article gn4r4k$s80$1@news.motzarella.org, "Dead
>> Kitten" wrote:
>>
>>> MillerT wrote:
>>>> On 2/13/09 4:08 PM, in article gn4nmc$mam$1@news.motzarella.org, "Dead
>>>> Kitten" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> MillerT wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> How is that a "forgery"?
>>>>>>>>> It's a user-name forgery.
>>>>>>>> Wrong. No One would be a user-name forgery.
>>>>>>> Not unless it's his actual user name. It would be using a domain name
>>>>>>> without permission, though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As everyone has pointed out to you, you don't own the right to publish
>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>> the name No One.
>>>>>>> Who is "everyone" and how exactly do they all know that?
>>>>> Why didn't you answer that question?
>>> Continued evasion noted.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Everyone in the group could do that, without violating
>>>>>>>> their ISP's TOS, if they were so inclined.
>>>>>>> And how exactly do you know THAT? Did you read all the service
>>>>>>> agreements?
>>>>> Why didn't you answer those questions?
>>> Continued evasion noted.
>>>
>>>>>> Tell ya wot, find an example to disprove my claim and I'll amend it.
>>>>> First answer all my questions and then we'll discuss whether or not you
>>>>> are in a position to try ordering people around.
>>>> Is that an order?
>>> Shall I go ahead and claim SPANK right now, since it's obvious that I
>>> kicked your weak ass with my very first contribution to this thread?
>>> Yes, I believe I'll do that. Might as well.
>>>
>>> SPANK
>>
>> Impressive.
>
> You are dismissed, spankard. You have been beaten and humiliated and
> there's nothing you can do about that except cry about it.
Lol. If you say so.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
