XPost: alt.fan.howard-stern, misc.survivalism, alt.usenet.kooks   
   XPost: alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles, rec.arts.poems   
   XPost: alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: thisemail@isamunge.com   
      
   On 2/26/09 1:19 PM, in article l9ndq4tqfk46v3ui98bihsd5vi6nbninem@4ax.com,   
   "lab~rat  >:-)" wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:03:29 -0500, MillerT    
   > puked:   
   >   
   >> On 2/26/09 1:01 PM, in article l7mdq457oqr322hekeau40ml6d1kdovh28@4ax.com,   
   >> "lab~rat  >:-)" wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 26 Feb 2009 16:14:32 GMT, Curly Surmudgeon   
   >>>  puked:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:21:06 -0500, lab~rat  >:-) wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:29:14 -0600, "John \"C\""   
   >>>>>  puked:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Kali"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:go4460$i3l$9@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> chase@cheeze.net says...   
   >>>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:47:54 -0500, Kali  puked:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Oh for crying out loud, are you getting a grade or some shit for   
   >>>>>> this?   
   >>>>>>>> If you're gonna be such a dick that you can't see when someone is   
   >>>>>> just   
   >>>>>>>> having good natured humor, I don't want to waste my time with your   
   >>>>>>>> uptight dumb ass.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Lighten up, Bozo.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Point out this "good natured humor" that you feel I missed.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Here's the reality: you couldn't argue you point so you snipped out   
   >>>>>>> Miller's argument and made a sarcastic remark. I'd agree with you on   
   >>>>>>> the humor, in that I admit to a slight chuckle. But the pathetic   
   >>>>>>> factor outweighed the fun part.   
   >>>>>>>> --   
   >>>>>>>> lab~rat  >:-)   
   >>>>>>>> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?   
   >>>>>>> --   
   >>>>>>> Kym Barnard "Usenet Skank"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I can now see why your "ex" divorced you, Kym !!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> This was a woman I was posting to?  If I knew that it all would have   
   >>>>> made more sense...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Please tell us how gender, orientation, or color negates the validity of   
   >>>> one's argument?   
   >>>   
   >>> Where did I say it negated anything?   
   >>   
   >> What point were you trying to make?   
   >   
   > That women argue differently than men?   
      
   In what way?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)