home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.psychology.psychotherapy      Practice of psychotherapy      54,659 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 53,604 of 54,659   
   atlas bugged to miguel   
   Re: "Free Speech" Hypocrites   
   04 Mar 09 05:43:36   
   
   XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles   
   XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: atlasbuggedbyspam@gmail.com   
      
   "miguel"  wrote in message   
   news:rcorq49jk5nc8ng3tvh9ftvb8055tsondu@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:30:14 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > snip   
   >   
   >   
   >>I've had Rat-Fuck-A-Ratz killfiled for a long time.   
   >>   
   >>Even when my filters aren't up-to-snuff (like with a newer rig, or where   
   >>there's quoting in someone else's post,) I find Wolfus, Ratz, and a couple   
   >>of others so boring that my head spins and I skip over anything they   
   >>write.   
   >>   
   >>Anytime I see "billboarding" by a poster, except for He Who Is Most Honest   
   >>(that's you,) my eyes really glaze over.   
   >>   
   >>That said, Ratz, at least, needs to be sued, so if you have a starting   
   >>point   
   >>to track the insect down, I'd be happy to amend and put him/her/it in as a   
   >>defendant.   
   >   
   > Do I need to be sued too?   
      
   No.  There's no law against just being a harmless jerk.   
   >   
   > If you think so, I'll be happy to provide my contact information so   
   > you can send your process server out.   
      
   Being man-up enough to make the offer also mitigates against.   
      
   I'll need you to answer some questions, though.   
      
   e-mail contact info to: atlasbuggedbyspam@gmail.com   
      
   This way we all find out immediately if you're any more man than the   
   rodents.   
   >   
   > This offer should not be misconstrued of a waiver of any affirmative   
   > defense.   
      
   My comments here should not be misconstrued as a waiver of any legitimate   
   legal claim I may have against you.   
      
   In short, I've not come close to reading all your posts.  The SOL on my   
   claims is six years.   
   >   
   >>It's an interesting strategy - Wolfus, for example, is so infinitely   
   >>boring   
   >>and dull, I simply cannot even stand to look through the thousands of crap   
   >>posts, even if it did yield libel or identity clues.   
   >>   
   >>Being boring to Wolfus's degree is one of the few things I simply cannot   
   >>fend off.   
   >>   
   >>Still, I'd like to add Ratz and "Some Guy" just because they're obvious   
   >>libelers and criminals, so any info to effectuate service would be   
   >>welcome.   
   >>   
   >>They're unmitigated fucks, the both of them, and I'd "out" them and sue   
   >>both   
   >>in a New York minute.   
   >>   
   >>Until further notice, Mather is off the hook.  Too much trouble to go   
   >>outside USA jurisdiction.  PJR too, sadly, if he's really in the U.K.   
   >>   
   >>The rest are going to love my shiny new Docket number which I received   
   >>today. I like that they drool on my every word so I'll publish that later   
   >>tonight, or perhaps tomorrow.   
   >   
   > Sure you will.   
      
   It also not against the law to be dumb, or even peurile.   
   >   
   > LOL!   
      
   Watch to see who has the last.  And keep drooling.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca