Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.psychology.psychotherapy    |    Practice of psychotherapy    |    54,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 53,613 of 54,659    |
|    Gregory Hall to All    |
|    We ignore the AUK "KOOK" awards at our p    |
|    06 Mar 09 11:44:24    |
      XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles       XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei       From: greghall@home.fake              Although the AUK "Kook" Awards exist primarily to interfere with subscriber       efforts to deal with the relevant facts, I've composed this post to speak a       language of reconciliation, not retaliation. As a preliminary, let me state       that is my desire work together with the award caballers in an atmosphere of       friendship, change and hope. Call me the Obama of AUK.              Don't get me wrong, though. As I've stated before, by allowing the AUK       "Kook" Awards to diminish the free speech rights of certain individuals whom       only the AUK "Kook" Award-givers perceive as "Kooky" we 'upper crust'       subscribers are selling our souls for a pittance. Instead, we should be       striving to evaluate and understand the tactics the Caballers have used       against us the targeted (because of our perceptive normalcy) individuals.       Certainly, the AUK "Kook" Awards caballers truly believe that any halfway       plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance which       performance has been totally lacking during the month of February as Atlas       Bugged seems to have a core group of libelous caballers on the run and in       exile.              It's just so transparent that a disingenuous and conspiratorial cabal of       creepy and argumentative, hostile, megalomaniacal, soporific, lawless dupes       who display a base, community college, pseudo-intellectual, liberal       aberrancy that stirs in the black hearts of all AUK "Kook" Awards       nominators, seconders, and voters who use scapegoating as a foil to draw       anger away from more accurate targets are obsessed and addicted beyond       reason and consequently unable to see their folly.              Can we just simply sweep this all under the rug? We cannot! We ignore AUK       "Kook" Awards at our own peril. Think I'm exaggerating? Just ask any of the       most valuable members of the targeted, erudite community and we'll all tell       you how if any of us were to become dictator of AUK, our first act of       business would be to build bi-partisan bridges where in the past all that       existed were moats and bogs. We would further use our position to inform       certain segments of the Usenet's population that if it weren't for a growing       number of homosexual, transsexual, metro sexual and pedophiliac liberal scum       and DataBasux users the AUK "Kook" Awards would have few friends. This is a       shame as proper-administered AUK awards propagated in the original spirit of       fun would be an asset instead of the mean-spirited liability it has become       in the hands of vindictive people.              Day by day, thanks to the efforts of Atlas Bugged and his friends the truth       is being impressed upon us that the AUK "Kook" Awarder's humorless       platitudes are merely a distraction. They serve primarily to generate more       self-serving awards piled atop a crumbling foundation of past awards which       were all built on shifting sand dunes by inept architects - tawdry       showpieces existing to prop up egomaniacal Usenet talking heads, by       engendering more punditry from malicious folks. Meanwhile, AUK "Kook" Awards       drones are continuing their mean-spirited work of advancing the AUK 'Kook"       Awards real goal, which is to criticize other people's beliefs, politics,       businesses and lifestyle and to marginalize their aspirations. This when the       original intent was to poke fun along the lines of a 'roast.'              It's my personal opinion, based on months of observation, that the AUK       "Kook" Awards administration claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly       after getting caught red-handed trying to smear and damage a respected law       firm but this is too little, too late - this half-hearted and forced       (probably by counsel) silence. This turning over a new leaf under duress is       an outright lie that is now being circulated by AUK 'Kook" Awards' acolytes       who, as typifies liberals, are totally hypocritical and obvious. The truth       is that whenever there's an argument about the AUK "Kook" Awards' devotion       to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that AUK 'Kook"       Awards' ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent.       That should settle the argument pretty quickly. If it takes more than that       do visit the Kookpedia website and the method to the madness sticks out like       a sore thumb via crass repetition. In typical liberal fashion they are out       to destroy any and all detractors.              The AUK "Kook" Awarders seem to have no trouble sweet-talking what I call       cancerous caballers into helping it harvest what others have sown. While       riding on the backs of those the caballers belittle, these losers actually       think they are the ones pulling the load. This is the flaw in the AUKer       campaigns of malice and malignity. They don't understand this is       preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and       boldly. Instead they languish in the past with their delusions of grandeur       and haven't yet noticed they've been vigorously kicked to the curb.              Let me therefore state that some folks respond to the AUK 'Kook" Awarder's       audacious doings in much the same way that they respond to television       dramas. They laugh. They cry. They wring their hands. They emote. But this       is Usenet where they read them, they reply to them, they talk about them       both in front of them and behind their backs but they feel no overwhelming       compulsion to do anything about them. (Except for Atlas, that is.) That's       why I insist we build a Usenet world overflowing with compassion and       tolerance. Rather than sue them out of existence how about we humor them.       How about we all recognize that they are a struggling comedy act, a joke on       themselves? How about we embrace reality when it's so obviously front and       center?              Only through unbiased self-education can individuals gain the independent       tools they need to discern fantasy from reality. But the first step is to       acknowledge the frequent liberal lies about how people prefer "cultural       integrity," "multicultural sensitivity, "diversity," and "political       correctness" to choosing an independent and moral course through life that       the liberal, brainwashed folks who are just so many sheep fear. We need to       explain to such people that the AUK "Kook" Awards cabal wonders why everyone       hates them when they honestly fell they are doing a public service.       Apparently, they never stopped to think that maybe it's because they       recently delight in their malicious persecution that started out as comedy       but has regressed into a means of savage revenge.              I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to the AUK "Kook"       Awards supporters and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work       together to constructively criticize the AUK "Kook" Awards caballers       publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of       superiority, their blindness to the abuse of private power and their failure       to see they are the ultimate PKBers.                     --       Gregory Hall              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca